THE PSYCHOLOGIST : AdScam Recap

AdScam Recap

Since AdScam has really been heating up as of late, I've decided to post a somewhat brief recap or explanation as to what it is for the benefit of my global friends.

The seperatist movement in Quebec had been gaining momentum since a failed referendum back in 1980 which resulted in another public vote in 1995. Quebec voters were once again asked if their province should seek independence from Canada and form their own state. The motion, which was brought forward by the then ruling Parti Quebecois, was narrowly defeated by a margin of 50.58% to 49.42% on 30 Oct 1995.

In 1996 Prime Minister Jean Chretien and his Fiberal cronies, still reeling from the close call, hatched a scheme in which they hoped to promote Canada by allocating tax dollars to sponsor sporting and cultural events in Quebec by way of the so-called sponsorship program. The program was to be administered by Public Works and Government Services Canada.

Within a few years, rumours of misuse had begun to surface and Chretien responded by calling for an RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) investigation into the manner in 1999. Not much became of the slow moving investigation except for the removal of Alfonso Gagliano as Minister responsible for Public Works. He was subsequently offered a plum in the form of his new position - ambassador to Denmark.

The proverbial poop didn't hit the fan until February of 2004 when Auditor General Sheila Fraser released the findings of her audit into the problem-plagued sponsorship program. What she discovered was soon to rock the Liberal Party of Canada to its very foundation. The report stated that as much as $100 million had been paid out to Liberal-friendly advertising firms in Quebec for little or no work at all. The fickle finger of guilt pointed not only at Public Works but prominent Crown Corporations such as Canada Post and Via Rail with Chretien loyalists Andre Ouellet (Canada Post head) and Jean Pelletier (Via Rail head) quickly being drawn in. It wasn't long before a number of high profile Liberals became embroiled in the scandal. As a result of Jean Chretien's retirement in late 2003, the boondoggle landed squarely in the lap of new Liberal leader and Prime Minister Paul Martin. Recent testimony has also revealed that a percentage of these funds were funnelled back into Liberal coffers.

There were no more plums for Gagliano as he was fired from his post as ambassador by Martin who was now in full damage control mode. The PM called for a public inquiry which became known as the Gomery Commission to be headed by John Howard Gomery of the Superior Court of Quebec. Martin also denied any personal knowledge of wrongdoing instead blaming everything on his predecessor Jean Chretien. This despite the fact that Martin was actually Minister of Finance from 1993 to 2002 and as such must have had detailed knowledge of the goings on charged the Conservatives. In addition to this he was also a member of the Treasury Board at the time.

As the inquiry continues, the testimony has become more and more interesting albeit shocking. As a result many recent polls have showed the Liberals to be in a free fall with support for the Conservative Party of Canada quickly increasing.

To read more on this scandal check out the official Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities website here.

Technorati tags: Adscam, News, Politics, News and Politics, Canada

No comments:

Background

The essence of conservatism is caution. The essence of Leftism is anger

This blog is written solely by John Ray, who has a Ph.D. degree in psychology and 200+ papers published in the academic journals of the social sciences. It does occasionally comment on issues in psychology but is mainly aimed at giving a conservative psychologist's view on a broad range of topics. There are very few conservative psychologists.

The blog originated in Australia and many (but not most) posts discuss Australian matters. Australians have an unusually good awareness of events outside their own country. Australian newspapers feature news from Britain and the USA not as an afterthought but as a major part of their coverage. So Australians do tend to have a truly Western heart, which is the reason behind the old name for this blog. So events in Australia, Britain and the USA all feature frequently here, plus occasional coverage of other places, particularly Israel.

A primer in American politics for non-Americans:

SCOTUS is the Supreme Court of the United States, the highest court in the land

The "GOP" stands for "Grand Old Party" and refers to the Republican party. The GOP is at present center/Right, while the Democrats have been undergoing a steady drift Leftwards and now have policies similar to mainstream European Leftist parties.

The ideological identity of both parties has however been very fluid -- almost reversing itself over time. In the mid 19th century, the GOP was the party of big government and concern for minorities while the Democrats advertised themselves as "The party of the white man" -- an orientation that lasted into the mid 20th century in the South. The Democrats are still obsessed with race but have now flipped into support for discrimination AGAINST whites.

Was Pope Urban VIII the first Warmist? Below we see him refusing to look through Galileo's telescope. People tend to refuse to consider evidence— if what they might discover contradicts what they believe.

Global warming

Calibrated in whole degrees. Larger graph here

Climate scientist Lennart Bengtsson said. “The warming we have had the last 100 years is so small that if we didn’t have meteorologists and climatologists to measure it we wouldn’t have noticed it at all.”

The term "Fascism" is mostly used by the Left as a brainless term of abuse. But when they do make a serious attempt to define it, they produce very complex and elaborate definitions -- e.g. here and here. In fact, Fascism is simply extreme socialism plus nationalism. But great gyrations are needed to avoid mentioning the first part of that recipe, of course.

Two examples of Leftist racism below (much more here and here):

Beatrice Webb, a founder of the London School of Economics and the Fabian Society, and married to a Labour MP, mused in 1922 on whether when English children were "dying from lack of milk", one should extend "the charitable impulse" to Russian and Chinese children who, if saved this year, might anyway die next. Besides, she continued, there was "the larger question of whether those races are desirable inhabitants" and "obviously" one wouldn't "spend one's available income" on "a Central African negro".

Hugh Dalton, offered the Colonial Office during Attlee's 1945-51 Labour government, turned it down because "I had a horrid vision of pullulating, poverty stricken, diseased nigger communities, for whom one can do nothing in the short run and who, the more one tries to help them, are querulous and ungrateful."

Defensible and indefensible usages of the term "racism"

The book, The authoritarian personality, authored by T.W. Adorno et al. in 1950, has been massively popular among psychologists. It claims that a set of ideas that were popular in the "Progressive"-dominated America of the prewar era were "authoritarian". Leftist regimes always are authoritarian so that claim was not a big problem. What was quite amazing however is that Adorno et al. identified such ideas as "conservative". They were in fact simply popular ideas of the day but ones that had been most heavily promoted by the Left right up until the then-recent WWII. See here for details of prewar "Progressive" thinking.

R.I.P. Augusto Pinochet. Pinochet deposed a law-defying Marxist President at the express and desperate invitation of the Chilean parliament. He pioneered the free-market reforms which Reagan and Thatcher later unleashed to world-changing effect. That he used far-Leftist methods to suppress far-Leftist violence is reasonable if not ideal. The Leftist view that they should have a monopoly of violence and that others should follow the law is a total absurdity which shows only that their hate overcomes their reason

Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a war criminal. Both British and American codebreakers had cracked the Japanese naval code so FDR knew what was coming at Pearl Harbor. But for his own political reasons he warned no-one there. So responsibility for the civilian and military deaths at Pearl Harbor lies with FDR as well as with the Japanese. The huge firepower available at Pearl Harbor, both aboard ship and on land, could have largely neutered the attack. Can you imagine 8 battleships and various lesser craft firing all their AA batteries as the Japanese came in? The Japanese naval airforce would have been annihilated and the war would have been over before it began.

FDR prolonged the Depression. He certainly didn't cure it.

WWII did NOT end the Great Depression. It just concealed it. It in fact made living standards worse

Joe McCarthy was eventually proved right after the fall of the Soviet Union. To accuse anyone of McCarthyism is to accuse them of accuracy!

The KKK was intimately associated with the Democratic party. They ATTACKED Republicans!

People who mention differences in black vs. white IQ are these days almost universally howled down and subjected to the most extreme abuse. I am a psychometrician, however, so I feel obliged to defend the scientific truth of the matter:

The average African adult has about the same IQ as an average white 11-year-old and African Americans (who are partly white in ancestry) average out at a mental age of 14. The American Psychological Association is generally Left-leaning but it is the world's most prestigious body of academic psychologists. And even they have had to concede that sort of gap (one SD) in black vs. white average IQ. 11-year olds can do a lot of things but they also have their limits and there are times when such limits need to be allowed for.

America's uncivil war was caused by trade protectionism. The slavery issue was just camouflage, as Abraham Lincoln himself admitted. See also here

Did William Zantzinger kill poor Hattie Carroll?

Did Bismarck predict where WWI would start or was it just a "free" translation by Churchill?

Leftist psychologists have an amusingly simplistic conception of military organizations and military men. They seem to base it on occasions they have seen troops marching together on parade rather than any real knowledge of military men and the military life. They think that military men are "rigid" -- automatons who are unable to adjust to new challenges or think for themselves. What is incomprehensible to them is that being kadaver gehorsam (to use the extreme Prussian term for following orders) actually requires great flexibility -- enough flexibility to put your own ideas and wishes aside and do something very difficult. Ask any soldier if all commands are easy to obey.

A good article on Leftist hate

The real history of social Darwinism

Some personal memoirs

Memoir highlights

THE PSYCHOLOGIST

AdScam Recap

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive